A Wedding in Brownsville By Isaac Bashevis Singer

A Wedding in Brownsville By Isaac Bashevis Singer Isaac Bashevis Singer (1903-1991) was a Polish-American writer and Nobel Prize-winning author known for his Yiddish-language stories that explore Jewish life, folklore, and themes of spirituality, identity, and morality. His works often delve into the complexities of human nature, blending realism with mysticism. In his story, “A Wedding in Brownsville,” Singer tells the tale of a man named Dr. Margolin, who returns to Brooklyn’s Brownsville neighborhood for a wedding after many years. As he reconnects with familiar faces, he is haunted by memories of his past, including lost love and the horrors of the Holocaust. The story explores themes of memory, guilt, and the enduring impact of trauma on personal identity and relationships. Q: Who were the Senciminers? Ans. Sencimineers were Jewish villagers from the town of Sencimin, where Dr. Margolin once lived. They are now dispersed due to the devastation of WW II, and some of them attend th...

Ozymandias text with explanation and themes

Ozymandias

The poem is a sonnet by Percy Bysshe Shelley. It was in 1817 as part of a poetry contest with a friend and it was published in “The Examiner” in 1818. The title of the poem “Ozymandias” refers to the Egyptian pharaoh Ramses II. The poem is about the transience of power and human life in contrast with the ability of the art to sustain the test of time. It also has the ability to preserve the past. The poem breaks away from the typical sonnet tradition in both form and rhyme which shows Shelley’s interest in challenging both poetic and political conventions.

Text of the poem

I met a traveller from an antique land,

Who said—“Two vast and trunkless legs of stone

Stand in the desert. . . . Near them, on the sand,

Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,

And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,

Tell that its sculptor well those passions read

Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,

The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed;

And on the pedestal, these words appear:

My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!

Nothing beside remains. Round the decay

Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare

The lone and level sands stretch far away.”

 

 

Summary of the Poem

 

The speaker meets a traveller who came from an ancient land. The traveller narrates

that he saw two large trunkless legs of a statue in the desert. There was a broken face

of the statue lying near the legs. It was half buried in sand. The facial expressions of the

statue, the frown on his forehead and wrinkled lips combine to form a haughty sneer. It

shows the expertise of the sculptor who very skilfully recreated those expressions. On

the pedestal of the statue the following words inscribed: “My name is Ozymandias, the

king of kings. You powerful rulers of the world, look at what I have built and achieved,

and despair at the thought that you cannot emulate it. Now nothing of the former glory

of this king remains. There is vast empty and flat sand surrounding the remains of the

large statue in a never ending and barren desert.

 

 

 

 

Themes in the Poem

 

Transience of Power

One of Shelley’s most famous works, “Ozymandias” describes the ruins of an ancient king’s statue in a foreign desert. All that remains of the statue are two “vast” stone legs standing upright and a head half-buried in sand, along with a boastful inscription describing the ruler as the “king of kings” whose mighty achievements invoke awe and despair in all who behold them. The inscription stands in ironic contrast to the decrepit reality of the statue, however, underscoring the ultimate transience of political power. The poem implicitly critiques such power through its suggestion that both great rulers and their kingdoms will fall to the sands of time.

In the poem, the speaker relates a story a traveler told him about the ruins of a “colossal wreck” of a sculpture whose decaying physical state mirrors the dissolution of its subject’s—Ozymandias’s—power. Only two upright legs, a face, and a pedestal remain of Ozymandias’s original statue, and even these individual parts of the statue are not in great shape: the face, for instance, is “shattered." Clearly, time hasn’t been kind to this statue, whose pitiful state undercuts the bold assertion of its inscription. The fact that even this “king of kings” lies decaying in a distant desert suggests that no amount of power can withstand the merciless and unceasing passage of time.

The speaker goes on to explain that time not only destroyed this statue, it also essentially erased the entire kingdom the statue was built to overlook. The speaker immediately follows the king’s declaration found on the pedestal of the statue—“Look upon my works, ye Mighty, and despair!”—with the line “Nothing beside remains.” Such a savage contradiction makes the king’s prideful dare almost comically naïve.

Ozymandias had believed that while he himself would die, he would leave a lasting and intimidating legacy through everything he built. Yet his words are ultimately empty, as everything he built has crumbled. The people and places he ruled over are gone, leaving only an abandoned desert whose “lone and level sands” imply that there's not even a trace of the kingdom’s former glory to be found. The pedestal’s claim that onlookers should despair at Ozymandias’s works thus takes on a new and ironic meaning: one despairs not at Ozymandias’s power, but at how powerless time and decay make everyone.

The speaker also uses the specific example of Ozymandias to make a broader pronouncement about the ephemeral nature of power and, in turn, to implicitly critique tyranny. The speaker evokes the image of a cruel leader; Ozymandias wears a “frown” along with the “sneer of cold command." That such “passions” are now recorded only on “lifeless things” (i.e., the statue) is a clear rebuke of such a ruler, and suggests that the speaker believes such tyranny now only exists on the face of a dead and crumbling piece of stone.

The poem's depiction of the destruction of Ozymandias and his tyranny isn’t entirely fictional: Ozymandias is the Greek name for the Egyptian pharaoh Ramses II, who dramatically expanded Egypt’s empire and who had several statues of himself built throughout Egypt. In fact, the Ancient Greek writer Diodorus Siculus reported the following inscription on the base of one of Ozymandias’s statues: "King of Kings am I, Ozymandias. If anyone would know how great I am and where I lie, let him surpass one of my works." By alluding to an actual ancient empire, and an actual king, the poem reminds readers that history is full of the rises and falls of empires. No power is permanent, regardless of how omnipotent a ruler believes himself to be. Even the “king of kings” may one day be a forgotten relic of an “antique land.”

The Power of Art

“Ozymandias” famously describes a ruined statue of an ancient king in an empty desert. Although the king’s statue boastfully commands onlookers to “Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair,” there are no works left to examine: the king’s cities, empire, and power have all disappeared over time. Yet even as the poem insists that “nothing beside” the shattered statue and its pedestal remains, there is one thing that actually has withstood the centuries: art. The skillful rendering of the statue itself and the words carved alongside it have survived long after Ozymandias and his kingdom turned to dust, and through this Shelley’s poem positions art as perhaps the most enduring tool in preserving humanity’s legacy.

Although the statue is a “wreck” in a state of “decay,” its individual pieces show the skill of the sculptor and preserve the story of Ozymandias. The face is “shattered,” leaving only a mouth and nose above the desert sand, but the “frown,” “wrinkled lip,” and “sneer” clearly show Ozymandias’s “passions” (that is, his pride, tyranny, and disdain for others). The fragments interpret and preserve the king’s personality and show onlookers throughout history what sort of a man and leader Ozymandias truly was.

These fragments, then, are examples of art’s unique ability to capture and relate an individual’s character even after their death. In fact, the poem explicitly emphasizes art’s ability to bring personalities to life: the speaker explains that Ozymandias’s “passions” “yet survive” on the broken statue despite being carved on “lifeless” stone. Ozymandias may be dead, yet, thanks to the sculptor who “read” those “passions” and “mocked,” or made an artistic reproduction of them, his personality and emotions live.

In addition to highlighting the sculptor’s artistic skill, Shelley’s poem also elevates the act of writing through its focus on the inscription of the statue’s pedestal. The pedestal preserves Ozymandias’ identity even more explicitly than the statue itself. The inscription reveals his name, his status as royalty (“King of Kings”), and his command for “Mighty” onlookers to “despair” at his superiority and strength. His words are thus a lasting testament to his hubris, yet it is notably only the words themselves—rather than the threat behind them—that survive. Without this inscription, none would know Ozymandias’s name nor the irony of his final proclamation.

In other words, his legacy and its failure only exist because a work of art—specifically, a written work—preserved them. The poem therefore presents art as a means to immortality; while everything else disappears, art, even when broken and half-buried in sand, can carry humanity’s legacy.

This power of art is reflected by the composition of the poem itself. Shelley was aware that the ancient Greek writer Diodorus Siculus had described a statue of the Egyptian pharaoh Ramses II and had transcribed the inscription on its pedestal as "King of Kings am I, Ozymandias. If anyone would know how great I am and where I lie, let him surpass one of my works." Shelley’s poem exists solely because of Siculus’s description: Shelley and his friend and fellow writer Horace Smith had challenged each other to a friendly competition over who could write the best poem inspired by Siculus's description. This poem was Shelley’s entry, and it became by far the more famous of the two. Like Siculus’ description of the statue, this poem keeps Ozymandias’s story and words alive for subsequent generations.

The very composition of this poem, then, dramatizes the power of art: art can preserve people, objects, cities, and empires, giving them a sort of immortality, and letting future generations “look on [past] works” not with despair, but with wonder.

Man Versus Nature

As a Romantic poet, Shelley was deeply respectful of nature and skeptical of humanity’s attempts to dominate it. Fittingly, his “Ozymandias” is not simply a warning about the transience of political power, but also an assertion of humanity’s impotence compared to the natural world. The statue the poem describes has very likely become a “colossal Wreck” precisely because of the relentless forces of sand and wind erosion in the desert. This combined with the fact that “lone and level sands” have taken over everything that once surrounded the statue suggests nature as an unstoppable force to which human beings are ultimately subservient.

Shelley’s imagery suggests a natural world whose might is far greater than that of humankind. The statue is notably found in a desert, a landscape hostile towards life. That the statue is “trunkless” suggests sandstorms eroded the torso or buried it entirely, while the face being “shattered” implies humanity’s relative weakness: even the destruction of a hulking piece of stone is nothing for nature.

The fact that the remains of the statute are “half sunk” under the sand, meanwhile, evokes a kind of burial. In fact, the statement “nothing beside remains” can be read as casting the fragments of the statue as the “remains” of a corpse. The encroaching sand described in the poem suggests that nature has steadily overtaken a once great civilization and buried it, just as nature will one day reclaim everything humanity has built, and every individual human as well.

The desert, not Ozymandias, is thus the most powerful tyrant in Shelley’s poem. It is “boundless” and “stretch[es] far away” as though it has conquered everything the eye can see, just as it has conquered Ozymandias’s statue. Ozymandias may be the king of kings, but even kings can be toppled by mere grains.

 

Symbols in the Poem

Sand

In the poem, sand is a symbol of nature’s power and also of time itself. The sand has eroded and buried the statue and all of Ozymandias’s works, a reminder that nature can destroy all human achievements, no matter how substantial. Because it destroyed the statue over time, and because of the idea of sand in an hourglass, sand also represents time itself, which has similarly worn down and eventually buried Ozymandias's empire.

The Statue

The statue of Ozymandias has a few different symbolic meanings. First, it is a physical representation of the might of human political institutions, such as Ozymandias’s empire; this is the symbolic purpose for which Ozymandias himself had the statue built. However, because the statue has fallen into disrepair, it also holds a symbolic meaning that Ozymandias didn't intend: it represents how comparatively fragile human political institutions actually are in the face of both time and nature’s might.

The statue also symbolizes the power of art. Through the sculptor's skill, the statue captures and preserves the "passions" of its subject by stamping them on "lifeless" rock. And the statue also symbolizes the way that art can have power beyond the intentions of even those who commission it. While Ozymandias saw the statue as a way to forever capture his power and magnificence, the poem hints that the statue so thoroughly reveals Ozymandias's haughty cruelty that it also serves to mock him. While Ozymandias's great works have been destroyed and disappeared by nature and time, art in the form of the stature endures, keeping Ozymandias's memory alive (albeit not in entirely the ways he would have wanted).

It is also possible to interpret the statue in a third way. Because Ozymandias is clearly a tyrant, the fact that the statue has become a "wreck" hints that the statue might symbolically represent the speaker of the poem's hope and belief that tyranny will always crumble, which also happened to be one of Shelley’s own personal political passions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Last Leaf by O. Henry (William Sydney Porter) Mcqs

A Wedding in Brownsville By Isaac Bashevis Singer

First Year at Harrow by Winston Churchill (Objective type and Study Questions)